home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Subject: comp.fonts FAQ: Diffs from last posting
- Newsgroups: comp.fonts,comp.answers,news.answers
- From: norm@ora.com (Norman Walsh)
- Date: Tue, 25 Jan 1994 16:28:26 GMT
-
- Archive-name: fonts-faq/diffs
- Version: 2.0.3
- Diffs-from: comp.fonts FAQ v2.0.2
- Diff-tool: diff -c2
-
- diff -c2 v2.0.2/font-faq.1 v2.0.3/font-faq.1
- *** v2.0.2/font-faq.1 Thu Dec 30 14:54:08 1993
- --- v2.0.3/font-faq.1 Mon Jan 24 14:28:32 1994
- ***************
- *** 2,7 ****
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
- The comp.fonts FAQ
- ! Version 2.0.2.
- ! December 30, 1993
- Compiled by Norman Walsh
-
- --- 2,7 ----
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
- The comp.fonts FAQ
- ! Version 2.0.3.
- ! January 24, 1994
- Compiled by Norman Walsh
-
- diff -c2 v2.0.2/font-faq.2 v2.0.3/font-faq.2
- *** v2.0.2/font-faq.2 Thu Dec 30 14:53:58 1993
- --- v2.0.3/font-faq.2 Mon Jan 24 14:28:24 1994
- ***************
- *** 306,310 ****
- provided in most contemporary fonts for exactly this reason.
-
- ! * Liam Quim makes the following observations:
-
- The term ligature should only be used to describe joined letters in
- --- 306,310 ----
- provided in most contemporary fonts for exactly this reason.
-
- ! * Liam Quin makes the following observations:
-
- The term ligature should only be used to describe joined letters in
-
-